The continuing protests against the military takeover here showed signs on Friday of shifting into a movement against the authoritarian tactics of the new government rather than one demanding the return of the ousted president, Mohamed Morsi. Multimedia
Multimedia Feature Timeline of Turmoil in Egypt After Mubarak and Morsi Related
Looming Airstrikes in Syria Pose Test for Egypt’s Leaders and the Opposition (August 30, 2013)
Connect With Us on Twitter Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines. Twitter List: Reporters and Editors Although the evidence is tentative and anecdotal, any expansion of the protests’ base would be a significant setback for the new government. It has so far enjoyed considerable support for its crackdown on Mr. Morsi’s Islamist supporters in the Muslim Brotherhood, whom it describes as violence-prone extremists.
Authoritarian power, whether by one person or a group, hinders a society’s ability to adapt to the modern world. It creates a society that is not resilient. Switching one authoritarian for another (hich is kind of what Russia has done) will make a brittel society.
Because people want the power dispersed and have the tools to make it happen. Islamists are melding with others to push for a free Egypt, not one run by a different form of authoritarian.
The question, I believe, is how many people will die to make it happen. ANd do using authoritarian approaches against one authoritarian work or not?