When crazy people win elections, sane people lose

Confessions of a Tea Party Casualty
[Via Daring Fireball]

Fascinating piece by David Corn for Mother Jones, on Bob Inglis, a very conservative South Carolina Republican who lost the primary election to a “Tea Party” candidate. Why? Because Inglis is not insane:

I sat down, and they said on the back of your Social Security card, there’s a number. That number indicates the bank that bought you when you were born based on a projection of your life’s earnings, and you are collateral. We are all collateral for the banks. I have this look like, “What the heck are you talking about?” I’m trying to hide that look and look clueless. I figured clueless was better than argumentative. So they said, “You don’t know this?! You are a member of Congress, and you don’t know this?!”

And because he wouldn’t falsely smear President Obama as a “socialist”:

For me to go around saying that Barack Obama is a socialist is a violation of the Ninth Commandment. He is a liberal fellow. I’m conservative. We disagree… But I don’t need to call him a socialist, and I hurt the country by doing so. The country has to come together to find a solution to these challenges or else we go over the cliff.


Pretty nutty stories. I am sure that those who are checking out Social Security cards are a very small part of the Tea Party movement. I sure hope so.

Because we need people who can rationally deal with the complex problems we have to face.

If we only end up with people who retreat to their own made up worlds based on weird conspiracies and lies, then we are in real trouble.

3 thoughts on “When crazy people win elections, sane people lose

  1. Well, it is one way to demonize the activists on the conservative side by calling them insane. Thanks a lot! One cannot have a rational conversation with someone who thinks they are crazy so I guess I will just have to vote and not talk.

    1. I certainly do not think those stories are representative of the Tea Party and said so. I would welcome rational discourse. Complex problems will not be solved by those with only one viewpoint. If people can not talk in a rational fashion, then the nutjobs and the ones who want to keep us divided win.

      We need rational thinking from all directions, not just conservative and not just liberal, in order to make it through. Cutting off the flow of good ideas is like tying one arm behind our back. I certainly have never felt that you or your conversations were crazy, so please do not remove yourself from this conversation.

Comments are closed.