by NASA Goddard Photo and Video
House pares NASA’s 2013 spending back to 1959 levels, suggests Europa mission
[Via Ars Technica]
The Appropriations Committee of the US House of Representatives has set May 8 as the date they will begin debating an election year budget that pares NASA back to its lowest level as a percentage of the Federal budget since 1959, surpassing last year’s record low of 0.48%. In absolute terms, it will roughly match the 2006 Bush levels, cutting money from the Space Technology and Commercial Crew program requests for a third year, while adding funds to the Space Launch System and the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, two House favorites.
[More]
I wrote about this the other day. NIce to see it hitting the mainstream.
And the Republicans in the House want to kill private expansion into space – they want NASA to pick only one company to support, rather than 4. As NASA is a prime contractor for many companies, this would seriously set-back efforts.
They gave NASA half what they asked for here – $406 million. Meanwhile, they gave NASA $1.3 billion to develop its own system.
The biggest curiosity in the space business is currently the Space Launch System, labeled by many as the “Senate Launch System” because NASA seems to have been forced to take a rocket they didn’t specify and don’t want. Both the House and the Senate require the Space Launch System by law to have the capability to lift 130 metric tons to orbit, even though no mission exists yet for the giant rocket and no one is sure that one will exist for the forseeable future.
The SLS is so expensive that NASA will only be able to afford to launch it every two years at best, giving rise to a strong suspicion that the rocket will be cancelled before completion. In attempt to spare all parties from further embarassment, the new House bill orders NASA to come up with a list of possible missions and destinations for SLS.
$1.3 billion. To put this in perspective – from a recent report – using just the current technology we have, $2.6 billion would fund a ten year project to find, reach and move a 7 meter asteroid to lunar orbit, ready to mine. Two years of funding for a boondoggle NASA does not want would have use mining asteroids in 10 years or less!
Why fund a purely government program that is already late and years over budget that is not wanted when fairly supporting a public-private partnership would put Americans in space rapidly,would have us mining asteroids and doing what else? Why force NASA to spend money on a system it does not want and that will not really provide any benefits? Why hurt the progress of a real path to space that we can do right now for continued funding of a white elephat ‘maybe’?
Why? I’d guess because, like most government welfare, it serves to fund projects in their states. They do not care if it actually produces anything but the money will fund jobs.
This is their stimulus – hurt American progress into space, put America at a disadvantage compared with other countries – so that they can create make-work in their states. I’d have more respect for them if they came out and said that was exactly what they were doing.
Private corporations are going to be hiring lots of those people now working on the NASA boondoggle. Too many companies and those jobs disappear at NASA and then where will those politicians be. Much better to reduce the competition so those jobs the GOP are fighting for stay put.
The companies realize this which is why Space-X just announced it is seeking permission to have a launch site in Texas. The Texas delegation has been very protective of jobs at the Johnson Spaceflight Center. But perhaps if those jobs migrate to the private sector in Texas, the politicians will be mollified.
What a weird reversal where the Democratic members want to get private companies to take over much of the low Earth orbit work while the GOP wants big government to fund worthless projects.
Republicans in Congress already has pushed back private efforts 1-2 years because of the approach in previous years of underfunding the private/public partnerships. Now they want to kill it almost totally. So they can hand it to just one contractor – apparently Boeing. Which is at least one if not more years behind the others.
All so they can keep a large white elephant going and supply jobs for a useless rocket system.
Pay more for slower development. That is what the GOP in the House is supporting.
Idiots. The inability to launch Americans into space sits solely at the feet of the GOP members in the House if they follow through with this.
They really do want to return to a pre-Sputnick funding approach to space.
Like this:
4 bloggers like this post.