The rapid drop in intelligent Congressional speech

The changing complexity of congressional speech
[Via Sunlight Foundation]

Congress now speaks at almost a full grade level lower than it did just seven years ago, with the most conservative members of Congress speaking on average at the lowest grade level, according to a new Sunlight Foundation analysis of the Congressional Record using Capitol Words.

[More]

The Constitution is written at 17.8 grade level. The Declaration of INdependence is at 15.1. Even the Gettysburg Address is at 11.2.

Congress now speaks at a 10.6 grade level.

In 2005, Republicans were the most eloquent speakers in Congress, as they had been for years. Their speeches were greater than the 11.6 grade level, better than the Democrats.

Within 4 years there was a tremendous drop in the GOP speech patterns. They had dropped to below 10.6 levels.

NewImage

The Democrats stayed close to their normal patterns, not dropping below 11 until 2011.

The Republicans went from the highest grade levels in Congress to the lowest in just 4 years. Of the 20 lowest by grade level, 18 are Republicans.

Of course, what does the data actually mean? In the US, the average American reads at between an 8th and 9th grade level.

So are the legislators dumbing down their words  because they are dumber or are they trying to be better communicators?

I imagine only history will be able to separate out those two possibilities. I go for better communication because many are now having their words heard directly rather than filtered through the media and dumbed down there.

About these ads

4 Responses to “The rapid drop in intelligent Congressional speech”

  1. Parsing trends in Congressional speech » No measure of health Says:

    [...] just saw something thought provoking: “The rapid drop in intelligent Congressional speech“. It’s based on this analysis from the Sunlight Foundation, drawing out some [...]

  2. eldan Says:

    This is fascinating, but I see some major caveats with the original study: http://eldan.co.uk/2012/05/parsing-trends-in-congressional-speech/

    In terms of your closing question, I think the answer is partly that speakers expect to be heard verbatim, and partly just that they expect to be *heard* rather than *read in transcript*.

    • Richard Gayle Says:

      I agree. The fact is that they probably feel their constituents will actually hear them speak via C-Span, YouTube, etc. It might be interesting to see what grade level their campaign speeches are at.

    • eldan Says:

      If I’ve understood the implications of the opposition vs governing party study right, I’d expect campaign speeches to be generally simpler than those made in Congress. Shouldn’t be too hard to actually test that intuition this year.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 320 other followers

%d bloggers like this: