An interesting discussion of science and religion

argueby o5com

Can Science Explain Everything?
[Via AAAS News - RSS Feed]

AAAS DoSER Event Explores the Power—and Possible Limits—of the Scientific Method

In an event organized by the AAAS Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Religion, speakers explored the value of the scientific method—and whether there are limits to its power.

[More]

As with many articles, they bury the lede. Read to the end.

The religious side answers flatly “No!.”

The scientific side answers “We don’t know.”

So we have a very strong opinion against a somewhat weaker one. What happens when this occurs, even when the strong opinion is in the minority?

Turns out the research on this was just published. A minority with a strong opinion can overcome a majority with a weak one, overturning the views of the majority.

The only way for the majority view to prevail here  is if a large number of uninterested or ignorant members of the community exist. As this is not present when discussing science and religion, it seems unlikely that the views of science will ever overtake those of religion, even if science is the view of the majority.

Even if science is factually correct.

Fighting creationism may only succeed if we can actually create a large cohort who simply does not care, rather than trying to convince people of evolution’s truth. That seems to be the case in much of the rest of the world.

So this must be the new fight for science – create people who just do not care. That sure sounds exciting. /snark


Great Christmas story of returned pet

Lost VA dog turns up eight years later in CA, reunited with owners
[Via AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth]

Absolutely wild story. Imagine finding your dog 8 years later. And they found her because the owners put a microchip under the dog’s coat. I did that with Sasha. It wasn’t that expensive, and obviously worth it (well, it did take 8 years for someone to get the dog and actually think of trying to the microchip, but still).

[More]

While I do not always agree with Americablog, I do like it when they link to stories like this – an unbelievable story of a dog traveling completely across the country and coming back home after 8 years.

Found in the wilderness  of Northern California, Petunia was still an affectionate dog. Finally, after 8 years, the microchip that was imbedded in her was used to find the rightful owners.

Nice story to read at this time of year.

How about an 11th way Steve Jobs changed the world?

pixarby sjorsvb

10 ways Steve Jobs changed the world: There may never be another CEO like him
[Via MacDailyNews]

“There may never be another chief executive like him. Apple’s former CEO and co-founder transformed the world’s relationship with technology — forever,” Fortune reports.

 

“This year one of the world’s most important and transformative business and technology leaders passed away. Steve Jobs, the legendary and mercurial co-founder of Apple, died Wednesday, Oct. 5 at age 56,” Fortune reports. “In this story, Fortune looks back at how he changed the way we think about and use technology forever, putting his own stamp on everything from the personal computer to the music industry.”

[More]

The 10 things are pretty easy and obvious – music, personal computers, etc. – but what about Pixar and entertainment? Surely Jobs had some involvement in the creation of a new art form, one that only his organization has been totally successful at. Over $7 billion in revenue from just  12 movies is not something to ignore.


The reason aliens are few and far between

galaxyby cosmobc

Why We Haven’t Met Any Aliens | Seed Magazine
[Via danielmiessler.com]

I suggest a different, even darker solution to the Paradox. Basically, I think the aliens don’t blow themselves up; they just get addicted to computer games. They forget to send radio signals or colonize space because they’re too busy with runaway consumerism and virtual-reality narcissism. They don’t need Sentinels to enslave them in a Matrix; they do it to themselves, just as we are doing today. Once they turn inwards to chase their shiny pennies of pleasure, they lose the cosmic plot. They become like a self-stimulating rat, pressing a bar to deliver electricity to its brain’s ventral tegmental area, which stimulates its nucleus accumbens to release dopamine, which feels…ever so good.

The fundamental problem is that an evolved mind must pay attention to indirect cues of biological fitness, rather than tracking fitness itself. This was a key insight of evolutionary psychology in the early 1990s; although evolution favors brains that tend to maximize fitness (as measured by numbers of great-grandkids), no brain has capacity enough to do so under every possible circumstance. Evolution simply could never have anticipated the novel environments, such as modern society, that our social primate would come to inhabit. That would be a computationally intractable problem, even for the new IBM Blue Gene/L supercomputer that runs 280 trillion operations per second. Even long-term weather prediction is easy when compared to fitness prediction. As a result, brains must evolve short-cuts: fitness-promoting tricks, cons, recipes and heuristics that work, on average, under ancestrally normal conditions.

The result is that we don’t seek reproductive success directly; we seek tasty foods that have tended to promote survival, and luscious mates who have tended to produce bright, healthy babies. The modern result? Fast food and pornography. Technology is fairly good at controlling external reality to promote real biological fitness, but it’s even better at delivering fake fitness—subjective cues of survival and reproduction without the real-world effects. Having real friends is so much more effort than watching Friends. Actually colonizing the galaxy would be so much harder than pretending to have done it when filming Star Wars or Serenity. The business of humanity has become entertainment, and entertainment is the business of feeding fake fitness cues to our brains.

Sobering.

[More]

I disagree with the thought that technology will prevent us from galactic travel. In fact, I think it is the only hope we have to accomplish that.

I used to think that overcoming the nuclear threat was the biggest hump for technical civilizations. In fact, many science fiction works depict this as the reason more civilizations are not found in the galaxy.

Many simply blew themselves up.

I no longer think that is true. I think the hurdle is actually one that is seen for every other life form on Earth and presumably the Universe – sustainability.

Every organism on Earth expands until resources limit that expansion, then they collapse and find a point of equilibrium where their numbers are supported by the ecological resources.

We are entering that phase with mankind. Virtually all of our problems stem from increasingly unsustainable economies and ecologies.

Civilizations that are unable to deal with that, ones that eventually crash due to limited resources, never make it. We are on that path.

Our economies are built to increase exponentially. But access to resources does not increase better than linearly. This is the principle Malthus identified.

The Industrial and Green Revolutions prevented earlier Malthusian catastrophies. Now we are on the brink of another one.

And this is the big one, the one that probably prevents other civilizations in the Universe from progressing.

Without a change, we will collapse. So, we either alter the economies, making them more sustainable and not so exponential or we find new resources to use.

Those resources are found in space. Recent research indicates that possible hydrocarbon fuel can be found on Pluto. What would have to happen for that to be economically useful?

To continue forward, we also need to deal with the increasing presence of our own waste products, ones that are also harming ourselves. Sustainability is not just finding new resources but also making the best ecology for us to survive in.

So, the big hump for galactic civilizations is finding the resources they need to continue while also dealing with the increasing waste products from those resources.

Without finding adequate solutions to both, the civilizations simply collapse. If we collapse now, we will probably never get back to this stage because we will have used up and dispersed all the resources needed to get to this stage.

The next 50-100 years will determine if mankind makes the leap to a galactic civilization or remains a shattered husk of its former self. The fact that we do not see many examples of alien cultures means, to my mind, that this last hump is try difficult to hurdle.

Given our current imbroglio I have little hope for success.

“Not only is it not done right, but even if it was done right it would be the wrong thing to do”

ben franklinby perpetualplum

Walk through an airport with Bruce Schneier
[Via Boing Boing]

Vanity Fair’s Charles C. Mann walked through Reagan International Airport with Bruce Schneier, noting all the ways in which “security” adds expense and inconvenience without making us safer. By the end of the trip, he concluded:

To walk through an airport with Bruce Schneier is to see how much change a trillion dollars can wreak. So much inconvenience for so little benefit at such a staggering cost. And directed against a threat that, by any objective standard, is quite modest. Since 9/11, Islamic terrorists have killed just 17 people on American soil, all but four of them victims of an army major turned fanatic who shot fellow soldiers in a rampage at Fort Hood. (The other four were killed by lone-wolf assassins.) During that same period, 200 times as many Americans drowned in their bathtubs. Still more were killed by driving their cars into deer. The best memorial to the victims of 9/11, in Schneier’s view, would be to forget most of the “lessons” of 9/11. “It’s infuriating,” he said, waving my fraudulent boarding pass to indicate the mass of waiting passengers, the humming X-ray machines, the piles of unloaded computers and cell phones on the conveyor belts, the uniformed T.S.A. officers instructing people to remove their shoes and take loose change from their pockets. “We’re spending billions upon billions of dollars doing this—and it is almost entirely pointless. Not only is it not done right, but even if it was done right it would be the wrong thing to do.”

Smoke Screening

(via Kottke)

[More]

A nice dissection of how we have become an increasingly militarized country, willing to give up civil liberties for a semblance of security – even if that security is paper thin or ineffectual.

We have become the country Ben Franklin warned about. They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

We gave up essential liberties and are well on the way to losing all of them.

I see no political leaders of either party swimming against the current tide of fear and do not expect things to change for quite some time, if ever.

My only solace is that we had a similar period of outright rejection of essential liberties following WWI, with both Democrats and Republicans coming together to pass various sedition acts.

They seem to be collaborating again. It sure would be nice to have some patriots like the Founding Fathers who treasured the Constitution over their own aggrandizement. Our current government is a bunch of ants clambering over the deep footprints of our predecessors.

I do not feel this will end well.

Tablets about a year old won’t be upgraded to new OS

NewImageby 3 Sverige

Samsung can’t cram both TouchWiz and Android 4 onto Galaxy S, Tab
[Via Ars Technica]

The original Samsung Galaxy Tab and Galaxy S will not be updated to Android 4 because Samsung’s TouchWiz interface takes up too much space, the company announced Friday. Samsung calls the choice between TouchWiz and Android 4 “inevitable,” but insists to customers that keeping TouchWiz over Android 4 will provide the better user experience.

Samsung announced Wednesday that several of its recently released products would be upgraded to Android 4 by March 2012, including the Galaxy S II and the Galaxy Note. The company followed up by saying that the Galaxy S, released in June 2010, and the Galaxy Tab, released October 2010, will not be able to take the upgrade, despite being fairly recent releases. Why? The devices’ ROMs are too small to hold both Samsung’s TouchWiz interface, Widgets, video-calling application, and Android 4 at the same time.

What did you really expect Samsung to do—let you install a new operating system in place of that UI overlay you never asked for? Despite Samsung saying it has your best interests in mind, we expect to see a few users do their best to dump TouchWiz in favor of an Android 4 install, however frowned upon that may be.

[More]

My iPad is older than that and it still runs the latest iOS. I expect it to be doomed sometime soon but you never know with Apple. It still sells the iPhone 3GS which is two iterations back or about 3 years.

But in the Android world, you only pretty much are sure of getting the current generation of OS. There are still a lot of problems with upgrading to the next generation, as we see here. These devices are still within their 2 year contract with any phone company.

Interesting since Android 4 is the first real touch-based OS yet these touch devices will not be running it.

Apple has an incentive to get people to upgrade as it drives app sales, amongst other things. WHat incentive is there in the Android ecosystem?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 204 other followers