Something tio watch out for – Large Icelandic volcanic eruption

New Icelandic volcano eruption could have global impact
[Via BBC News | Science/Nature | World Edition]

Hundreds of metres under one of Iceland’s largest glaciers there are signs of a looming volcanic eruption that could be one of the most powerful the country has seen in almost a century.

Mighty Katla, with its 10km (6.2 mile) crater, has the potential to cause catastrophic flooding as it melts the frozen surface of its caldera and sends billions of gallons of water surging through Iceland’s east coast and into the Atlantic Ocean.

“There has been a great deal of seismic activity,” says Ford Cochran, the National Geographic’s expert on Iceland.

[More]

There have been some large eruptions here and the volcano is overdue. Possibly a lot of die could be melted. Or a lot of ash put in the atmosphere.

Draft federal climate research plan is a pipe dream

ostrichby SeeMidTN.com (aka Brent)

Draft federal climate research plan gives new emphasis to ‘decision support,’ sustained assessments, and communications
[Via ClimateScienceWatch]

Will the Obama administration stand up for the priorities in this plan and push for funding it when the going gets rough with the denialists in Congress?  We talked with the Yale Forum on Climate Change & the Media about the U.S. Global Change Research Program’s draft 10-year strategic plan for climate and global change research. The plan, now being updated for the first time since 2003, aims to build on the $2 billion federal program’s strengths in scientific research and global observing systems by significantly enhancing the program’s science-for-society component. The plan sets goals of building sustained capacity to assess impacts and vulnerabilities, informing decisions on adaptation and mitigation, and advancing public communication and education.

[More]

Anything with the word climate in it will be eviscerated by the House. Apparently the best way to deal with climate is just to not fund any research. That’ll make the world cool.

We ignore the natural world at our peril. Yet this seems to be the response of our politicians.

Methane from thawing permafrst could be a big tipping point

methaneby Fikret Onal

Nature Bombshell: Climate Experts Warn Thawing Permafrost Could Cause 2.5 Times the Warming of Deforestation!
[Via Climate Progress]

Back in February, a major study found that thawing permafrost feedback will turn Arctic from carbon sink to source in the 2020s, releasing 100 billion tons of carbon by 2100.  That study, by NOAA and the National Snow and Ice Data Center, conservatively assumed all of the carbon would be released as CO2 and none as the far more potent greenhouse gas, methane (CH4).

But that is unlikely, as this video of University of Alaska, Fairbanks, assistant professor Katey Walter Anthony, suggests:

A new article in Nature, “Climate change: High risk of permafrost thaw” (subs. req’d) concludes:

Arctic temperatures are rising fast, and permafrost is thawing…. Our collective estimate is that carbon will be released more quickly than models suggest, and at levels that are cause for serious concern.

We calculate that permafrost thaw will release the same order of magnitude of carbon as deforestation if current rates of deforestation continue. But because these emissions include significant quantities of methane, the overall effect on climate could be 2.5 times larger.

[More]

I’ve written about the introduction of methane from thawing Arctic regions. Now we are seeing more specific numbers. When these methane traps are released, there really is no way to put them back. The amount of GHG released increased spontaneously at much higher rates.

This is where anthropogenic causes of warming can become tremendously enhanced by the release of non-anthropogenic GHG. There could be 1,700 billion tons of carbon held in the soils of the North. This is larger than earlier projected because they found that the carbon extend much deeper in the permafrost than thought. This amount is twice as much as is present in the atmosphere right now.

Models estimate that perhaps 1/5 of this could be released over the next century.

Its release would rapidly increase global temperatures. And if much of it was in the form of methane the effects would be tremendous, as methane is 70 times better at holding in the heat from the greenhouse effect as carbon dioxide.

The largest extinction event in Earth’s history coincided with a huge release of methane, when global temperatures rose about 6 °C. The warmest recent period – the PETM – also saw a rise of 6 °C and a huge release of methane.

The large-scale release of methane from both polar waters and melting land could be the tipping point that substantially increases temperatures,. Once we hit that, even stopping our own use of fossil fuels will have little effect. The heat-trapping carbon is already there and beyond out ability to deal with.

Overcoming La Nina, 2011 to Rank As 10th-Warmest Year

Anomalies in global average surface temperatures for La Niña and other years. Credit: WMO.

Overcoming La Nina, 2011 to Rank As 10th-Warmest Year
[Via Climate Central - News, Blogs & Features]

Global temperatures in 2011 will likely rank as the 10th-warmest on record, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). If this ranking holds up once data from November and December come in, it would mean that 13 of the warmest years since record-keeing began have all occurred during just the past 15 years.

Still, the 2011 figures would mark a dip from last year, which was tied as the warmest year on record. Some people might think this means that planet is no longer warming, but that wouldn’t be a valid conclusion in any case. Global warming doesn’t mean the globe will literally be warmer each year than it was the year before. It’s an overall upward trend over a period of decades: no individual year means much by itself.

What’s remarkable, in fact, is that temperatures in 2011 did not cool off more than they did. The the fact that they didn’t may be just another indication that manmade global warming is really happening.

For much of this year, an unusually intense La Niña event — the strongest in at least 60 years — took place in the tropical Pacific Ocean. La Niña, which is part of a natural climate cycle, is characterized by a large area of cooler than average sea surface temperatures near the equator. Through a series of interactions between the ocean and air above it, these cooler waters can help reconfigure global weather patterns. In 2011 alone, La Niña has been implicated in everything from the (still ongoing) Texas drought to historic flooding in eastern Australia and southern Asia this year.

[More]

La Niña cools and this has been the strongest one in a long, long time. And, by checking the chart, we can see that the year following a La Niña usually has global temperatures at least 0.15°C higher, with some being almost 0.25 °C. This could make 2012 the warmest year in recorded history.

Of course, we do have 2 months to go and maybe things could change. But the fact that a cooling, very strong La Niña had such a small effect on cooling is worrisome.

The 2011 hurricane season

 

Watch it full screen in high definition. Lots of storms this year but you can really see what things like wind sheer did to the storms. Almost all were unable to break through the line protecting the US this year, resulting in rapid pushes north say from the States.

This is the result of Seattle’e record high pressure – 100 mph winds

Freak Wind Storm Wallops Western States
[Via Climate Central - News, Blogs & Features]

The wind storm is finally subsiding in the West, but it has left a widespread trail of destruction and frazzled nerves in its wake. Fueled by an epic difference in air pressure between the Pacific Northwest — where Seattle set an all-time record for its highest air pressure reading — and the Southwest, where a strong area of low pressure set up, high winds funneled over, through, and down the backside of mountains and mountain passes.

According to The Weather Channel, winds topped 100 mph in Utah, California, and Colorado, and came close to the century mark in Nevada and New Mexico. In the Los Angeles metro area, wind gusts of 40 to 70 mph were common.

 

NOAA computer model visualization of wind speeds and direction during the high wind event. The lightest blue to white colors represent the strongest winds — up to 80 mph. The flow vectors show the direction the winds are blowing.

 

At the summit of Mammoth Mountain in California, sustained winds of 140 mph — equivalent to a Category Four hurricane — were reported, along with gusts to at least 150 mph, according to the National Weather Service. Update: Examiner.com reports that an even stronger wind gust of 167 mph was recorded at Henniger Flats, Calif. If verified, that would be truly astounding.

[More]

Gusts to 150 mph! And these were not true Santa Ana winds, which bring in warm temperatures. These came with falling temperatures. And the onset of winds could be very sudden – from 20 mph to hurricane force.Building damage was huge.

So while the Pacific NW got some unusual clear days in winter, California got hammered. Our record high pressure resulted in their record winds.

Seattle has an historic day in weather. Who knew?

barometerby Andres Rueda

History is Made: Highest Pressure in Sea-Tac History!

[Via Cliff Mass Weather Blog]

We are living through historic weather.    UW’s Neal Johnson ran the numbers and found that the sea level pressure at Seattle-Tacoma Airport today was the highest since record keeping began there in 1948.  Here are the top pressures since 1948, starting with the highest pressure first.

2011 12 01 08 1043.4

2011 12 01 07 1043.3
2011 12 01 09 1043.2
2011 12 01 10 1043.2
2011 12 01 11 1043.1
1949 01 28 16 1043.0
1949 01 28 17 1043.0
1949 01 28 14 1042.7
2011 12 01 06 1042.6
1949 01 28 13 1042.3
1949 01 28 15 1042.3
1949 01 28 18 1042.3
1949 01 28 19 1042.3
1957 01 16 10 1042.3
1957 01 16 11 1042.3
Last night at midnight Sea-Tac hit 1043.4 hPa, smashing the old record of 1043.0 hPa.

According to the Weather Underground site the highest pressure in Seattle occurred on 12/3/1921 (1043.90 hPa), but that was at a very different location (downtown Seattle, not the airport) and thus not a fair comparison.
I hope someone contacts Ripley’s Believe It or Not.

[More]

It was very foggy almost everywhere yesterday with very cold weather. Did not really seem to notice the high pressure. But is seems to have been a new record.

Steve’s death from cancer was a foregone conclusion

McDougall Newsletter: November 2011 – Why Did Steve Jobs Die?
[Via McDougall Newsletter]

Steve Jobs gave tacit permission and encouragement for me to write this newsletter article about the medical and nutritional aspects of his life when he commissioned his biographer to tell a true account. “I wanted my kids to know about me…” “Also, when I got sick, I realized other people would write about me if I died, and they wouldn’t know anything. They’d get it all wrong. So I wanted to make sure someone heard what I had to say.”(556) Jobs would have been pleased to hear my challenging second opinions about his pancreatic cancer and his diet, because my thoughts are in agreement with what he intuitively and factually knew to be correct. Hopefully, my account will bring some peace of mind to his family and friends after his untimely death.

This article is not meant as a critique of his doctors and their medical care. I am certain these professionals performed their best for him. In hindsight, everything is clearer. The purpose of this article is to set the record straight.

[More]

While much of this is speculative, it does present the sort of medical forensic analysis applied to dead historical figures. Long before his first diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, Jobs had body pains similar to what might be expected. He had periods of jaundice that can be symptoms.

The size of the tumors indicated that they most likely had spread beyond his pancreas long before the original diagnosis. And his vegan diet may have prolonged his life.

A fascinating read. It may not be correct but it provides a plausible hypothesis.

Demonstrating that capital markets are not rational

About Apple’s incredible shrinking P/E ratio
[Via Brainstorm Tech: Technology blogs, news and analysis from Fortune Magazine » Apple 2.0]

In 2007 it was trading for nearly 50 times earnings. Today it’s 10. What happened?

Click to enlarge. Source: Asymco

Perhaps the most succinct commentary on Leonid Kanopka’s naive claim that Apple (AAPL) is a “bubble ready to burst” (see “A few fries short of a Happy Meal“) was Nicu Mihalache’s plaintive response: ”Do you know what P/E is?”

The price-to-earnings ratio, as every trader knows, is the simplest way to gauge how the market values a company. A high P/E — like the nearly 50 times earnings investors were paying for Apple four years ago — is a signal that the market has high hopes for a company. A low P/E — like the current 10.05 forward earnings ratio — is a vote of no confidence.

[More]

Apple keeps making more money than ever and the stock drops. That is not how things are supposed to work.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 183 other followers