Lincoln knew

I wrote a little bit about this a month ago but things have become much more obvious. Just as Lincoln’s coming election clarified the machinations of  his opponents, so too today do we see similar machinations used by Obama’s opponents.

From Lincoln’s Cooper Union Speech in 1860 [my emphasis]:

Your [his opponents] purpose, then, plainly stated, is that you will destroy the Government, unless you be allowed to construe and enforce the Constitution as you please, on all points in dispute between you and us. You will rule or ruin in all events.

[...]

But you will not abide the election of a Republican president! In that supposed event, you say you will destroy the Union; and then, you say, the great crime of having destroyed it will be upon us! That is cool*. A highwayman holds a pistol to my ear, and mutters through his teeth, “Stand and deliver, or I shall kill you, and then you will be a murderer!”

Today, we now see the Republicans following the role of the highwayman, holding the debt ceiling hostage – with possible tremendous economic ramifications – in order to rule on all events. No compromise. Rule or ruin are the only two choices.

Destroying the Government is a useful goal to achieve their aims, which, as their leaders have stated, is simply to prevent a second Obama term. Ruin the Government in order to enhance their own political fortunes.

Just as the conservatives then had little room for compromise, so too do today’s. Many would seem to relish destroying the Government in much the same way their political antecedents tried.

But it is his own worrds to his own party that are most poignant and important.

Wrong as we think slavery is, we can yet afford to let it alone where it is, because that much is due to the necessity arising from its actual presence in the nation; but can we, while our votes will prevent it, allow it to spread into the National Territories, and to overrun us here in these Free States? If our sense of duty forbids this, then let us stand by our duty, fearlessly and effectively. Let us be diverted by none of those sophistical contrivances wherewith we are so industriously plied and belabored – contrivances such as groping for some middle ground between the right and the wrong, vain as the search for a man who should be neither a living man nor a dead man – such as a policy of “don’t care” on a question about which all true men do care – such as Union appeals beseeching true Union men to yield to Disunionists, reversing the divine rule, and calling, not the sinners, but the righteous to repentance – such as invocations to Washington, imploring men to unsay what Washington said, and undo what Washington did.

Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government nor of dungeons to ourselves. LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT.

Only a few substitutions of a couple of nouns makes this as relevant today as it was in 1860 – the discussion of conservative thought in his age by the soon to be leader of the revolutionaries. Perhpas some of the Democratic leaders today can hear those words.

* kinda neat that Lincoln said “That is cool.”

The incredible, amazing story of how a PC guy becamse an Apple fanboy

How the Editor of Windows Magazine Became an Apple Fanboy
[Via Cult of Mac]

I’ve been in denial for a while, but it hit me so hard yesterday that I finally have to admit it: I’m an Apple fanboy. Once you hear my story, you’ll agree that if it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone.

My first job out of college was as a reporter for a small California newspaper company in the late 1980s. It was a Mac shop. All the reporters had regular Macs (tiny screens, massive keys on the keyboard with like an inch of key travel). But the editors used what at the time were “giant” screens to do page layout (in hindsight, they were probably only 17-inch screens, or something like that). When I got promoted to managing editor, I was thrilled because that meant I got to do the page layout and use the big screens.

The year was 1990. I used a DOS PC at home, and a Mac at work. I loved journalism, especially the writing of opinion columns. But I didn’t really give a flying rat’s behind about local NIMBY politics. I loved computers. So I decided to seek employment in the growing field of computer magazines.

For those of you under the age of 25, a magazine is a blog made out of trees

Anyway, I landed a job as managing editor at a tiny startup publication called Windows & OS/2 Magazine. At least, that’s what it was called for the third issue. The second issue had been called OS/2 and Windows Magazine. The first issue was called OS/2 Magazine. As you might have guessed, the “GUI” scene for DOS-based PCs was in something of a transition period.

Windows was exploding in users, heading by 1991 for the 4-million user mark, which drove big interest in our little magazine. So we were acquired by New York-based CMP Media, and relaunched the publication as Windows Magazine.

It’s hard to imagine now, but PC magazines were huge in the 1990s. Our own editorial staff grew from 7 people to 62. Circulation rose from 75,000 to 840,000. Our largest issue topped out at 420 pages.

[More]

I’m sure he is not the only one who has made this path. The iPhones predisposes people to the iPad. Then th new Macbook Airs come out and there is no looking back.

Google search is dead

Roger McNee has a good point – mobile devices perform 100 time less searches than a laptop. 5-10 % of online connections are mobile devices. Google search is not sustainable at these growth numbers.

And that “a little company in Cupertino showed up” and wrecked Google’s plan for world domination.

Very interesting viewpoints.

Happy Sunday

For your listening pleasure

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 204 other followers