Why don’t journalists link to primary sources?
[Via Bad Science]
Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 19 March 2011 Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? Whether it’s a press release, an academic journal article, a formal report, or perhaps (if everyone’s feeling brave) the full transcript of an interview, the primary source contains more information for interested readers, it shows your working, and it allows [...]
[More]
Because then their misleading falsehoods would be too easily revealed. Read how they twist remarks by scientists into completely wrong-headed articles.
Of course, we can easily find the primary sources ourselves. And reveal just how far afield the media have taken themselves. We can fact-checl their ass.
Another reason why they continue to take a downward course. We can too easily demonstrate that they are failing at their primary purpose – to inform.
If the paper refuses to provide outside links to the primary sources, I start to wonder about its veracity and trustworthiness.

by
by
by
by 
