The “Twitter Can’t Topple Dictators” Article
[Via Pressthink]
It’s a genre that’s starting to get a swelled head about itself. Here’s why.
I found it! I announced on Twitter yesterday. “It” was the generic Twitter Can’t Topple Dictators article. I said it had everything, meaning: every identifying mark and mandatory cliché needed to lift a mere example to the exalted status of genre-defining classic.
First, let’s be clear about the genre in question.
[More]
One of the main rhetorical tricks of lazy analysts is the strawman argument. It is often easy to see. It states that “some say” without actually providing who actually said what.
Who actually said that Twitter was solely responsible for the uprising? It simply allows someone to write a few hundred words without having to actually provide thoughtful analysis.
Twitter was a tool that allowed information to flow in ways that old style dictators could not easily stop. But even if they could, people would have found other ways – such as cell phones.
Heck, we’ve had war games where the American attacking fleet was sunk using motorcycle messengers and calls to prayers.
It is the tools that ARE important in the hands of a determined group of people. A key is that these tools are greater with greater reach than ever.
by
by 
by 
