Now all America can enjoy an iPhone

NewImagenorth dakotaby eyspahn

iPhone-starved states welcome arrival of Apple’s revolutionary device
[Via MacDailyNews]

“Apple devotees in states largely disregarded under a formerly exclusive deal to distribute the iPhone rushed to stores to snap up the gadget early Thursday as Verizon Wireless entered the fray,” The Associated Press reports. “Phil Toso, the manager of a Verizon store in Baxter, Minn., said dozens of people showed up when the business opened at 7 a.m. Thursday. The store normally opens at 10. ‘The customers that are coming in are coming in for the iPhone,’ Toso said.”

[More]

I had not even realized that there were such large parts of the US without access to an iPhone. Not a lot of people but I am glad that now all 50 states have the ability. After waiting 4 years.

Apple: helping free ourselves from carriers

Why Apple’s smaller iPhone will be an utterly disruptive move
[Via MacDailyNews]

“Bloomberg claims Apple is working on a smaller, cheaper version of the iPhone for sale off-contract,” Jonny Evans writes for Computerworld. “The prototype is alleged to be around one-third smaller than the iPhone 4. It boasts a processor, display and other components similar to the current iPhone 4, and will be available off-contract. The kicker? It will cost around $200 and be available off-contract.”

[More]

Couple this phone with the ability to chose, on the fly, the best values for the customer, and you have a phone that works for the customer’s benefit, not the carriers.

I expect the carriers will fight this tooth and nail because it makes them simply commodity organizations and does not allow them to keep prices high. Add in White-Fi networks and the ability to load data without needing carriers becomes even more interesting.

Gates re iPad:”It’s a nice reader”

bill gatesby CATR

The (iPod)Touch(i)Pad
[Via asymco]

The world’s largest PC company just launched a “media tablet[1]“. Conflating the iPod Touch and iPad brands into “TouchPad” HP joins RIM in announcing an integrated OS/device product to compete as a platform vs. iOS and Android (and to some degree even against Windows).

There are others waiting in the wings. Presumably, Microsoft is hard at work to release a tablet-compatible Windows sometime near the middle of this decade. MeeGo is also going through its gestation period targeting Atom-based tablets. John Gruber notes the excitement around tablet platforms in his article about this post-PC renaissance in computing alternatives. I also noted that the end of the PC era was marked by the end of WinTel at CES.

In that context, yesterday’s WebOS event was perhaps anticlimactic. But it’s still remarkable. Consider how far we’ve come. Step back now and remember the dark days only one year ago when, right after the iPad announcement, a  nearly unanimously chorus was pouring derision on the concept.

    [More]

    The complete quote from Bill Gates demonstrates his lack of vision in this area and may explain why MS was unable to get people to buy tablets:

    “You know, I’m a big believer in touch and digital reading, but I still think that some mixture of voice, the pen and a real keyboard – in other words a netbook – will be the mainstream on that,” he said. “So, it’s not like I sit there and feel the same way I did with iPhone where I say, ‘Oh my God, Microsoft didn’t aim high enough.’  It’s a nice reader, but there’s nothing on the iPad I look at and say, ‘Oh, I wish Microsoft had done it.’”

    Voice, a pen and a real keyboard. No tablet coming out on the market now uses any of those approaches as a major method of input.

    In fact, the whole article is pretty much the definition of not getting it. How things change in a year! Noe evry company is trying to get a tablet out on the market. He talks about the iPad as though it will finally be the debacle that reduces Apple to the same level as all the other also-rans. At the very end he adds some possible caveats but it really is indicative of the feeling a year ago – the iPad was doomed to failure.

    Now every hardware and software manufacturer is touting their tablets, which all look like the iPad.

    But none of them got it a year ago and they do not appear to get it now. They simply hope that making it look like a iPad – same shape and color, app store, touch screen – they will become an iPad. The iPad, however, is simply part of a complex ecosystem Apple has created, that permits people, particularly developers, to pretty seamlessly move from mobile devise to desktop.

    No one else has that and until they do, there will be little competition.

    Partnering with Microsoft not the best way to pull a rabbit out of a hat

    In memoriam: Microsoft’s previous strategic mobile partners
    [Via asymco]

    Microsoft’s new “strategic partnership” with Nokia is not its first. For a decade the software company has courted and consummated relationships with a variety of companies in mobile and telecom. Here are the ones I can remember:

    • LG. In February 2009 Microsoft Corp. signed a multiyear agreement for Windows Mobile to be included on devices from LG Electronics Inc. LG would use Windows Mobile as its “primary platform” for smartphones and produce about 50 models running the software.

    What happened? LG made a few Windows Mobile devices but with WinMo uncompetitive, they abandoned the platform and moved to Android losing years of market presence and all their profits.

    • Motorola. In September 2003, Motorola  and Microsoft announced an alliance. “Starting with the introduction of the new Motorola MPx200 mobile phone with Microsoft Windows Mobile software, the companies will collaborate on a series of Smartphone and Pocket PC wireless devices designed to create a virtual “remote control” for the Web-centric, work-centric, always-on-the-go mobile professional.” In addition, the alliance includes cooperation on joint marketing and wireless developer programs.

    What happened? Motorola launched a series of Windows Mobile phones culminating in the Motorola Q “Blackberry killer”. As Motorola hit the rocks in profitability new management reached for the Android liferaft. The company now relies exclusively on the Droid franchise.

    [More]

    The rest read like a Who’s Who of telco. And Nokia has already been bitten by MS before. Yet they seem to have no choice.  ”This time for sure. PRESTO!!


    Storing genomic data, and reusing it, for decades may be problematic

    punch cardsby Marcin Wichary

    Science’s burden: storing terabytes of research data for decades
    [Via Ars Technica]

    Scientists in all fields collect large amounts of data, and it’s not always easy to organize, preserve, analyze, and use all of it in the best possible way. A recent issue of Science has a special section that highlights a few stories about how scientists deal with the data deluge.

    High-energy physicists tries to preserve and reuse data

    It may seem odd that particle physicists would ever want to look back at decades-old experiments as they forge ahead with newer, bigger hardware. However, with updated theories and perspectives, physicists can extract new results from old data. Siegfried Bethke, the head of the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich, Germany, managed to publish over a dozen papers when he reexamined data from his days as a young physicist at DESY, a high-energy physics lab in Germany.

    [More]

    Trying to reanalyze decades old data has always been hard. I recall researchers trying to exhume data from old NASA tapes, which were less than 10 years old at the time.

    Now we are looking at having our genomic data following us our whole life. Someone will have to be responsible for curating that data so that it can remain accessible over a 70 year period.

    Think about that. 70 years ago, data was not collected in any digital form. Look at how the Manhattan project dealt with calculations and data. Punch cards were a huge innovation. Yet, women acting in groups could keep pace with the punch card machines. ‘Time sharing’ was done by using different colored cards. This last innovation reduced the time of calculations from 3 months to a couple of weeks.

    So, if one wanted to examine the work being done by these people, one would have to not only find the punch cards used but also figure out how to recreate them in a format our modern instruments could examine. They used a half million cards of data to run one simulation.

    I’m not sure this recreation would even be possible.

    What will data retention be like in 70 years? Yet we will still need access to genomic data that is decades old. How will this be managed and by whom?

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 205 other followers