Dear Abby offers poor advice to insulted maker
[Via Boing Boing]
Yesterday’s Dear Abby offers a plaintive story sent in by “BLUE AT CHRISTMAS,” a maker:
DEAR ABBY: Five years ago, when my niece was 9, we came up with the idea of making Christmas cards and sending them out to special friends and family members. We both work hard to make sure each is attractive and in good taste, and we handwrite a personal note inside. We also print on the back that the card was “handmade with love.” This has become a tradition for the two of us, and the cards are quite beautiful. Last year, after we sent them out, I received a card from a friend with a small check inside. The card read, “I’m sending you this check so you can afford to buy ‘real cards’ next year.”
Further consultations with ‘friends’ revealed that they too thought she was a cheapskate, even though making them by hand actually incurred greater costs. Unfortunately, Abby’s response is absolutely inadeqate! She recommends: “I hope you returned it and deleted her from your Christmas card list.”
This will not do.
BLUE AT CHRISTMAS, the trick here is to respond to your friend’s meanspirited ignorance with a Tsar Bomba of passive aggression. I have prepared a letter for you to mail to her in response, which should also be copied (by hand!) to any friends of yours similarly unimpressed by the beautiful handiwork produced by your niece and yourself.
Dear Peregrina,
I’m sorry that our carefully hand-made cards, prepared at far greater expense than the cheap, mass-produced ones you mail out each year, lack whatever it is that animates your sense of worth.
It’s true that when it comes to expressing the spirit of Christmas, there’s nothing quite like a generic illustration of Santa Claus or a pine tree inaccurately overprinted with glitter, embossed into the world’s most inexpensive polyeurethane-sealed card stock. Nevertheless, my niece and I will take our chances with the creative enjoyment we fill our family time with, which we will continue to share with our genuine friends.
Yours sincerely,
BLUE AT CHRISTMAS
This marks the extent of your own correspondence. On the separately-mailed and uncashed check, however, have the child respond with the following, in flesh crayola:
Upset my auntie again and I’ll rip your head off and make macramé doilies out of your miserable gin-tightened sinews, you consumption-addicted simulation of a human being. Merry Christmas.
[More]
This response is much better than Dear Abby’s as it helps educate the miscreant while simultaneously making sure all your other card getters understand, as word will get around. Simply cutting them from the list does make sure you will not receive other ones from the group.
But explaining the reasons, especially the genius of having the news write on the uncanceled check, makes for an epic response whose message is crystal clear.
I wonder how a similar approach, using crowdsourcing, might work for other Dear Abby messages? How about this one?
DEAR ABBY: I am 13 and I have a problem. My mother gave me $20 so I could go Christmas shopping, but I forgot I was Christmas shopping and ended up buying everything for myself. Now what do I do, because she’s really mad. — IN TROUBLE IN MICHIGAN
Abby responds:
DEAR IN TROUBLE: Apologize to your mother, admit what happened wasn’t a memory lapse as much as yielding to temptation, and start doing whatever you can to earn more money. Some suggestions: shoveling sidewalks and driveways and dog walking, if the neighbors will let you.
I’m sure a crowd could come up with a much better, and more life changing, response than that.