How oil/gas pipelines make a nice niche for iron-eating bacteria

biocorrosion

SF Chronicle: Much ado about microbiologically influenced corrosion and natural gas lines
[Via Knight Science Journalism Tracker]

A story of of generally good quality catches the eye in the San Francisco Chronicle this morning – enterprising, pretty thorough if uncertain in conclusion – but that brushes only lightly against its main angle: iron-eating bugs and their ilk.

Jaxon Van Derbeken has it under a banner p. 1 head: Bacteria a culprit in explosion? The writer is on the newspaper’s large team that reported the explosion of a gas pipeline in the nearby city of San Bruno last month, and remains hard at work on the aftermath. After a mention of microbiologically influenced corrosion in recent coverage, Van Berkeen bores in here. The hed has a question mark for a reason. It says here there is no direct evidence this is why a 30-inch, entrenched gas pipeline blew out and incinerated a neighborhood. But it’s on the list of plausibilities.

But what is the process, shortened to MIC in the article and in technical literature alike? We learn here only that bacteria, given pooled water in such pipes, can form a biofilm. The slimy outer layer provides a cozy den while the buggers “release gases that attack the pipe wall,” a source tells him. Got it? Most of the story is about how to detect such infestations of pipelines, to clean them out, and to protect against recurrence – and about what the utility company did or didn’t do to stay on top of the pipe’s integrity.

[More]

This is one reason biology is such an important thing to know. These bacteria get going in the very unusual environmental niche inside a pipe. They can perhaps cause the pipes to fail.

And we can not grow them in the lab, having to rely on DNA sequencing to even know they are there. Biocorrosion sounds like something from the Andromeda Strain.

It is something to worry about as similar corrosion has been seen inside fire sprinklers.

I have 12 of the 20 apps that make the iPad strong already

20 apps that make Apple’s revolutionary iPad even stronger
[Via MacDailyNews]

Jason Hiner writes for TechRepublic, “I’ve compiled a list of my 20 favorite apps for taking advantage of the iPad’s strengths.”

1. Flipboard (feee)

2.

3. ( )

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

[More]

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16. Add in the bonus 21st one – Sky Walk – and I’m doing pretty well. Two of the ones I am missing require a monthly subscription,which I have not taken the plunge for and two are games.

Not too bad at all. The other ones I use a lot that are not hear are the IMDB app and the SoundPaper (now SoundNote) app.

“We made too many wrong mistakes.”*

mazeroski by daveynin
‘How About That?’
[Via Daring Fireball]

The television broadcast of game seven of the 1960 World Series was long considered lost. A copy has been found, apparently in good condition, in Bing Crosby’s wine cellar/media vault:

Crosby loved baseball, but as a part owner of the Pittsburgh Pirates he was too nervous to watch the Series against the Yankees, so he and his wife went to Paris, where they listened by radio.

“He said, ‘I can’t stay in the country,’” his widow, Kathryn Crosby, said. “‘I’ll jinx everybody.’”

He knew he would want to watch the game later — if his Pirates won — so he hired a company to record Game 7 by kinescope, an early relative of the DVR, filming off a television monitor. The five-reel set, found in December in Crosby’s home, is the only known complete copy of the game, in which Pirates second baseman Bill Mazeroski hit a game-ending home run to beat the Yankees, 10-9. It is considered one of the greatest games ever played.

MLB plans to broadcast the game in December.

[More]

*Yogi Berra describing how the Yankees lost the 1960 World Series.

Bill Mazeroski hit a home run in the bottom of the ninth inning of Game 7 of the 1969 World Series. The Yankees had tied it up in the top of the ninth. No other game 7 has ended in such a dramatic fashion.

But it was more than just that. The last two innings had some of the most exciting baseball ever.The Pirates went into the eighth inning down by 1, 5-4. And the Yankees scored two in the top of the eight to go up by 3. Here is what happened in the bottom of the eighth:

The Pirates opened the bottom of the eighth inning with singles by Gino Cimoli (pinch-hitting for Face), then Virdon (the latter’s was on a ground ball to short for what could have been a double play; instead the ball took a bad hop and struck Kubek in the throat [Kubek had to leave the game.]). Dick Groat then chased Bobby Shantz (who had entered the game in the third and had pitched five innings, after not pitching more than four during the regular season) with a single to score Cimoli. Jim Coates replaced Shantz and got Skinner out on a sacrifice bunt, which moved the runners up. Nelson followed with a fly ball to right, and when Virdon declined to challenge Maris’ throwing arm, Coates was one out away from getting the Yankees out of their most serious trouble of the afternoon.

However, a lapse by Coates allowed the Pirates to keep their inning alive. After stopping Roberto Clemente’s ground ball, first baseman Skowron turned and prepared to throw to Coates covering first, but Coates, thinking Skowron would make the play himself, wasn’t there, having stopped midway to the base. [Actually if you watch the film that was put together – minute 38 - it appears that Coates actually tried to make the play himself but his path took him too far away from the base to get back for the throw. It'll be nice to see a different angle from the TV cameras rather than the edited film. It may well be that Clemente would have beaten the throw because of the slow roller hit.] Skowron was forced to hold onto the ball, and Virdon scored to cut the Yankee lead to 7–6. Hal Smith followed with a three-run home run to give the Pirates a 9–7 lead. Ralph Terry relieved Coates and got the last out.

A lapse by the pitcher allowed the Pirates to get 4 more runs with only one out needed to have prevented all of them. It is very likely that the error Coates made at first had an effect on his focus, resulting in a 3 run homer to the next batter. Instead of being 7-5 Yankees, it was now 9-7 Pirates.

But the Yankees got two in the top of the ninth, tying the game. But the tying run was not without its oddity – a mental error by MIckey Mantle that almost cost the Yankees the game.

With one out, a man on third and Mickey Mantle on first. Yogi Berra hit a ball to first. The first baseman stepped on first, making Berra the second out. Then, MIckey Mantle made would might have been his fatal error – getting himself tagged out for the third out before the run crossed the plate. The first baseman, by touching first, removed the automatic force out. He would have to tag Mantle to get him out, usually in a rundown. If Mantle could occupy the first baseman and prevent himself from being tagged before the runner at third crossed the plate, the run would count and tie the game.

Mantle strangely immediately dove back to first, providing the real possibility he could be tagged out before the run scored. Luckily for him, the first baseman did not really expect that Mantle would try and come back so quickly. If the first baseman had been ready, he might have tagged Mantle out for the third out before the run scored – the run that tied the game at 9.

But Mantle went around the first baseman – who expected Mantle to be moving towards second. As a left hander, the first baseman had the ball in his left hand to throw to second. This normally requires him to take a short step towards the outfield so that the thrown ball will not hit the runner. That is one reason first basemen are usually left handed. They can throw quicker to second because they do not have to turn their body, as a right handed player would. Here, that step allowed Mantle room to get back. Mantle scooted around to the infield side and evaded the tag.

If the first baseman had been right handed he might have easily tagged Mantle, because his move to second would most likely has been on the infield side, right where Mantle was going. Instead the first baseman was moving in the wrong direction, giving Mantle just enough space to get back to the base, and not making the third out. A mental error by Mantle luckily did not affect the score.

The first batter in the bottom of the ninth was Mazeroski. With one ball and no strikes, he belted the ball over the left field fence and the game was over. All the heroics and luck of the Yankees of the last 2 innings was simply not good enough.

The wildest last two innings in a game 7 of any World Series. The Yankees had scored over twice as many runs as the Pirates in the Series and had 91 hits to 60. And they still lost.

And now, thanks to Bing, we will get to see it. We will see angles of the game that have not been seen since 1960.

I wonder what other stuff is stored in his house?

A figure to strike fear in the hearts of non-Apple mobile phone makers

How Apple is sucking the profit out of the mobile phone business
[Via Brainstorm Tech]

The iPhone’s growing share of the spoils could spell bad news for Google’s partners

percent-of-available-profit-from-mobile-phones-from-asymco.png?w=549&h=359

Source: Asymco

On Tuesday we posted a pair of pie charts that showed Apple (AAPL) selling 3% of the world’s mobile phones in the first half of 2010 and taking 39% of the industry’s profits. (See Apple’s outrageous share of the mobile industry’s profits.)

Asymco‘s Horace Dediu, however, did us one better. He published the graph above charting Apple’s share of the available profit in mobile phones as compared with its 7 biggest competitors over the past three years.

[More]

Some of the companies with the greatest investment in Android are also some of hose with the lowest profits – Motorola, LG, Sony Ericsson. Nokia will not be licensing Android and neither will RIM.

Apple might be eating up the whole market’s profits for some time. Then what happens when FaceTalk and White-fi make cell phones unnecessary?

A most innovative way to present some ideas on innovation

[Crossposted at SpreadingScience]

Where Good Ideas Come From, 4 minute version

Via Boing Boing]

Here’s a short video promo for Steven Johnson’s upcoming Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation, a lecture on the way that transformative ideas incubate for long times, come out of left field, and thrive best when there’s no one foreclosing on them because they’re too weird or disruptive.

[More]

I love this video. It encapsulates how new ideas come into being and that communication is critical. Organizations that make it easy for individuals to communicate and exchange ideas will have more innovative ideas.

This is slightly different than creating a social network that adopts and adapts to change easily, although they go hand in hand. Both reduce the friction of information exchange. What Johnson discusses are the connections that help disruptive innovators come up with their disruptive technologies. They connect to a wide range of other communities which can provide great ideas.

An adaptive community has the ability to filter and adopt new ideas rapidly. The good ideas get moved through rapidly, often interacting with others along the way to evolve into great ideas. There will also be strong links back to the disruptors, creating a knowledge cycle that gets to a solution faster.

A poorly adaptive community puts a road block on the ability of disruptors to connect to outside communities while at the same time providing sparse routes for their ideas to percolate through the organization. These communities not only have fewer innovative ideas, because of the lack of good communication linkages but will also be very resistant to adopting anything new, even if shown that the innovation is useful.

In a well balanced community, the communication between people has little to slow it down, disruptors connect to the communities they need for generating ideas, filters and mediators help discover the great ideas and pass them onto the doers, who can often reduce these ideas to practice. With the right feedback loops, this can be very efficient.

Web 2.0 approaches can be very effective in helping identify and support these types of adaptive communities.

A nice demonstration of why Windows 7 will not be a nice OS for a tablet

Supposed HP Slate prototype video (via John Gruber)Some…
[Via Marco.org]

Supposed HP Slate prototype video (via John Gruber)

Some standouts:

  • The Ctrl-Alt-Delete hardware button.1
  • The booting.
  • The mouse pointer that appears on screen for a few seconds after the desktop loads, tracking the first couple of touches, before some component presumably loads and tells it to hide. The touch features are obviously just sloppy bolt-ons to Windows.
  • The little blue dot animation on each touch to give some feedback that it received the touch, presumably because so many applications in Windows aren’t meant to show any sort of touch feedback, because they’re not designed for touch usage. Sounds like a blast.
  • The browser scrolling performance right before he says, “Very fast.”
  • Flash running in the browser… otherwise it might be responsive.
  • Tapping the address bar in Internet Explorer to type a URL doesn’t bring up the on-screen keyboard automatically, or hide it after the URL is entered — he has to hit the keyboard button on the side to show and hide the keyboard manually.

[More]

HP Slate video shows all that’s wrong with Windows 7 on tablets
[Via Ars Technica]

Engadget has posted a YouTube video purporting to show HP’s forthcoming Slate—the Intel-powered, Windows 7 PC in an iPad-like form factor. What the video really shows is a smart piece of hardware that’s let down by the software running on it.

[More]

Watch the video and see the horrid experience of trying to use your finger on a touchscreen for an OS that is not made for touch. As Marco states, you can see the mouse arrow appear, it takes forever to boot, and everything is so slow.

The miracle of the iPad is that the screen reacts so fast that it seems stuck to your finger. There is no latency in almost anything you do with your finger.

MS has a new mobile version coming out soon. It had better be a lot leaner and faster. we shall see just how optimized it is for tablets. Because the Android OS from Google is not designed to use on tablets.

As has been discussed by Google itself, the Android operating system is not optimized for a tablet. Unlike, what Apple did – making it very easy not only for iPhone apps to look great ion the iPad and making it easy for developers for make versions that run on either – Samsung is having to ask developers individually to change their apps to tun on the Galaxy tablet. Apps on the Samsung Galaxy tablet will not look very good. Some may not run at all.

In fact, tablets using a Google OS may use a completely different one – Chrome – when it ever comes out. As was stated in the article:

The Galaxy Tab’s Android operating system “can be replaced with Chrome, when that arrives, though owners who aren’t tech savvy should have this upgrade carried out by a professional,” wrote yesterday’s Sunday Times in a subscribers-only report that was quickly picked up on by Electricpig and others.

Great. Take it back in order to get an upgrade. Talk about a fragmented market. There are already 3-4 different Android OS out in the wild that may need different developer versions. Now a completely different OS for developers?


Apple rumorapalooza – new iPad, new Air, new iPhones

Chinese site claims design of Apple’s 7-inch iPad is ‘finished’

[Via AppleInsider]

Though questionable, rumors of a 7-inch iPad from Apple continue to crop up, with a new report alleging the device is now a “finished product.”

Citing rumors from production plants in Shenzhen, China, Shanzai.com reported Friday that Apple is in fact working on a 7-inch tablet, though its alleged design is said to be more like an iPhone 4. “Yes there will be a (7-inch) tablet, yes it’s well underway in terms of product development and in fact it’s a finished product,” the report said.

“Yes 5 plus different designs have been floating around to help Apple protect itself from people discovering its next product look and feel but… the final design will in fact bear more resemblance to the iPhone 4 stylings than the original iPad design.”

[More]

Apple readying production of smaller, lighter 11.6-inch MacBook Airs?
[Via AppleInsider]

Apple is destined to revamp its super-slim, but soft-selling MacBook Air as early as this fall, wrapping the new model around an LED-backlit display that’s nearly two inches smaller than the model available today, according to sources in Taiwan.

Since introducing the 13.3-inch MacBook Air as the “world’s thinnest notebook” nearly three years, Apple has watched sales of the ultra-portable trickle off to levels believed to be immaterial to its bottom line. As such, the product line has received little attention from the company, undergoing just two minor revisions in a 29-month span — the latter of which took place well over a year ago.

[More]

Pegatron rumored to begin CDMA iPhone 4 production in November
[Via AppleInsider]

A new report claims that Pegatron is set to begin “volume production” of a CDMA-version iPhone 4 in November.

Electronista was first to report Friday that industry sources had notified Digitimes of a November start for production of a CDMA iPhone 4. Sources said shipments of the smartphone from Taiwanese hardware manufacturer Pegatron will likely reach “3-4 million units in the first three months, and 10 million by mid-2011.”

Friday’s report is mostly in line with earlier rumors. In June, Digitimes reported that Pegatron had received orders from Apple for the CDMA iPhone 4.
[More]

Man, if even half this is true, the next 6 months could be amazing, since we are already expecting a revision of the original iPad, with a camera for FaceTime.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 183 other followers