This is actually more interesting than Gizmodo’s story

How Wired.com Tracked the iPhone Finder
[Via Daring Fireball]

Brian X. Chen:

And so the hunt for clues began — a week after Gizmodo broke its story. By then, Hogan had deleted his Facebook profile, and presumably every other social networking profile he owned, in an effort to hide. That made the search difficult, but his attempt to disappear was already a major clue that he was in trouble.

[More]

These guys showed some actual journalistic chops in tracking down the finder, as well as demonstrating some real ethical concerns about the process. That they were rewarded for their hard work is encouraging.

The difference between real journalism and a tabloid.

The blowout preventer that didn’t

ixtoc from NOAA
Is There a Feynman Fix for the Leaking Well?
[Via Dot Earth]

Can explosions be used to seal the leaking pinprick in the seafloor?

[More]

There are some interesting suggestions here. Innocentive is working to help route some of these to the right people. There are also a couple of nice links to information about blowout preventers: one from the Times written recently and one from an industry site written in November.

The latter, while giving a nice background on the development of blowout preventers, also mentions the company that was managing the current rig. Transocean had lower revenues in a quarter last year than expected. It said that this was due to blowout preventer issues on their deep water rigs:

Steven Newman of Transocean addressed the issue during an earnings conference call a few months ago. “The deepwater segment of the fleet, which is the 4,500 – 7,500 ft segment, 16 rigs in that fleet was the largest underperformer in Q2. We had a couple of human error incidents on drill floors on a couple of those rigs, and we had a handful of BOP problems; nothing that I would characterize as systemic or quarter specific. We did a deep dive on each one of those incidents. We’ve identified the root causes. We are going back to address them in our management system so they don’t happen again. They were anomalies.”

Makes one wonder just what the anomalies were?

And this has happened before. Almost exactly 30 years ago, a similar accident happened on a Mexican rig in the Gulf of Mexico (see photo). The rig collapsed and the blowout preventers did not work. Ixtoc 1 leaked oil at similar rates to the current leak for almost a year with about 5 million barrels of oil being released. And it was only in 160 feet of water, reachable by divers.

The US had 2 months to prepare before it hit our coast and it appears that much of it was kept from our shores.

NPR not only has some more but there is also a comment providing a lot of detail about the entire drilling process. From Barry Hexton:

Amazing the amount of digital BS being spewed on what happened, who’s at fault, ad nauseum. On the “what happened’ front, it will only be until BP and Transocean publically outline what procedures were used and what they believe well conditions were at the time of the explosion before any real information can be discerned. I know everyone wants or expects a ‘simple’ answer but deepwater drilling is not “simple”, it involves many detailed technical procedures and equipment, and the elements have to be looked at as a whole and not individually. [More]

There are a lot of possibilities but the pressures that are involved are phenomenal. The oil at depth may be greater than 10,000 psi. Containing that pressure requires a lot of sophisticated mechanics.

Another one bites the dust

iPad Killer? We can’t even get an iPad challenger
[Via Macworld]

HP has conceded the tablet war before it even engaged in battle by terminating the HP Slate project. Since Steve Ballmer unveiled the HP Slate prototype at CES—an attempt to steal the thunder from the impending announcement of the Apple iPad—the Slate has been the poster child and champion for everything the iPad isn’t.

[More]

This is the key paragraph:

Perhaps, though, that is ultimately why HP has terminated the Slate. Maybe HP realized what the HP-faithful and Windows loyalists still deny—the iPad represents a fundamental shift in mobile computing that defies direct comparison with PC’s or virtually any other platform for that matter.

Slapping a touch interface onto Windows does not come close to the iPad experience. First MIcrosoft and now HP. It will be a few years before there is something comparable and then only if there is a completely new operating system that is not Windows.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 183 other followers