by ckroberts61
Discover Mag blog, Slate: Two science-policy pundits dig into the climate “wars”
[Via Knight Science Journalism Tracker]
Chris Mooney and Matt Nisbet are easily linked in the mind, having for awhile joined forces in a touring two-man panel discussing public perception of science, scientific perception of the public, media sandwiched in between, and global warming politics. Both happen recently to have independently popped up with direct connection to the bloggy, angry public discussion over whether or not traditional academic climatology has somehow become so infected with arrogance, sloppiness, data distortion, or lefty hidden-agendaitis that therefore industrial society should happily burn all the coal it can without guilt, caps, taxes, or trade embargoes. Paying attention to their latest provides reporters on energy and climate beats a better idea how to report news in such an acid atmosphere.
[More]
Biologists have been dealing with these approaches for the last 30 years or so with respect to evolution. The same sort of attacks on ‘cub scouts by marines’, the same sorts of distortions, the same tactics by denialists, the same appeal to debate, the attacks in the press, etc.
We learned a lot in these battles, such as identifying the techniques used by denialists and working to neutralize them.
The difficulty here is that evolution does not directly affect anyone’s life while the ramifications of climate change does. And, just as the cub scouts became better trained over the years, so have the marines, only now they have put their gaze on an entirely different area and attacked with overwhelming force.
Luckily, facts are facts no matter how many millions are spent trying to persuade people otherwise. Science will win in the end. At least if we hope to remain a force in the coming environment.


