The pressing question this Penis Friday: how hard is hard enough?:
[Via NCBI ROFL]
Penile sufficiency: an operational definition.
If you read the whole abstract (apparently the whole paper is not available online) you will see two interesting facts. A lot of guys signaled that they were hard enough for penetration but then had a substantial time period until they reached maximal hardness, even though the measuring devices showed no change.
That is easy to explain. They wanted to keep watching the erotic videos! The machines were probably shut off once the ‘patient’ signaled full tumescence.
And 37% were unable to achieve full erection. From the abstract this seems ambiguous. By full do they mean enough for penetration or the maximal erection? And is this reported by the ‘patient’ or by the machine.
Because some of those guys may have wanted to watch the video again!
Or it might be similar to being piss shy. Perhaps some guys just do not get sexually excited when an instrument is attached to their penis in a lab where everyone is watching.
Now I want to find the article to understand what they mean by a full erection and how that was measured. And would Viagra make a difference? Sounds like it is time for a followup paper.
Technorati Tags: Science