More fake emails

Loan Arranger:
[Via New Urban Legends]

Did Barack Obama file a lawsuit to require banks to “make loans to poor people”?

Let’s see. Barack Obama is junior member of a legal team that is trying to prevent discrimination of blacks by redlining. It had to do with discriminating based on where one lived not whether one could pay a loan. It was a purely racial process and one that most rational people would see as discriminatory.

So somehow that becomes forcing banks to loan to poor people? It was about forcing banks to loan money to blacks who could pay the loan. Some people are just not rational.

No good deed goes unpunished, I guess. A factual incorrect, lying email that is apparently advocating a racist policy. I guess it will be all over the internet soon.

Technorati Tags:

My first paid app

App Store Pick of the Week: Grocery IQ:
[Via Apple Hot News]

Thanks to Grocery iQ ($4.99), you may never have to write another shopping list. Now you can tap to quickly build a comprehensive and highly legible list on iPhone or iPod touch, arrange your list by aisle to match the layout of your grocery store, check off items as you add them to your cart, build a purchase history and a list of favorites. Grocery IQ even lets you email your list to a designated shopper.

Really nice execution.

Technorati Tags:

Secret flash drive

Create a Secret Data Stash with a Fake Phonejack [Weekend Project]:
[Via Lifehacker]

This is very cool. Waiting to see it in a TV show soon.

Technorati Tags:

CRA not the problem

vault by cliff1066

The CRA: Its a Racial Thing . . .:
[Via The Big Picture]

Georgetown University’s legal and finance scholar Emma Coleman Jordan, and Bill Moyers look at the noise machine, which seems to be operating at full tilt:

BILL MOYERS: There’ve been a lot of voices on cable channels recently blaming this bubble, this crisis, the cause of all of this catastrophe we’re in right now, on poor people who took out mortgages that they couldn’t afford to buy home they wanted. They shouldn’t have. Watch these clippings and tell me what you think about them.

LAURA INGRAHAM: 1995 when Bill Clinton decided to tell, you know, Robert Rubin to rewrite the rules that govern the Community Reinvestment Act and push all these institutions to lend to minority communities, many very risky loans, that was a noble idea, perhaps, but that certainly wasn’t following free-market principles.

NEIL CAVUTO: I don`t remember a clarion call that said, Fannie and Freddie are a disaster. Loaning to minorities and risky folks is a disaster.

LARRY KUDLOW: It’s time for the Congress, Republicans and Democrats, to stop encouraging, exhorting, and forcing banks to make low income loans with no documentation. Stop that. The community reinvestment act which was passed in the mid nineties, which was extended in the early 2000s, literally pushed these lenders to make low income loans.

BILL MOYERS: Lending to minorities and risky people. Do you see this, are they seeing this as issues of race and class?

EMMA COLEMAN JORDAN: Absolutely. And it’s a cynical manipulation. It’s reprehensible. And, in the worse tradition of Lee Atwater and the Willie Horton ad, to use race as a wedge issue to make people who pay their mortgages believe that the people who are getting the benefit of the 700 billion dollars, that we’re being asked to pay, are poor, minority people who caused the crisis.

This is unconscionable. This problem is not a problem that was caused by the Community Reinvestment Act. The data is very clear that the Community Reinvestment Act loans were being offered in a way to people that were much more responsible and had none of the characteristics of default that are being attributed in this discussion. And what this does is to say, this problem is a problem that was caused by black people.

And it means that it gives an opportunity to bring up that old wedge. But I think the people in the country are smarter today. I just don’t think it’s going to fly. I think that people understand that the enemy is not a person who got a home loan and was tricked into getting that loan by a fast-talking broker who originated the loan but that the problem was the securitization process, the high leveraging that Wall Street was doing, the lack of regulation.

I really feel that any pundit who spews this crud is either unknowing or malicious. The actual data shows that not only did people who got CRA loans default on them at much lower rates than the general population but that these loans were also good money-makers for the banks. The poor and the minorities were better customers than the average person. That is why the banks actually held most of these loans in their own portfolios than trading them around. From the report:

Our study suggests that without the CRA, the subprime crisis and related spike in foreclosures might have negatively impacted even more borrowers and neighborhoods. Compared to other lenders in their assessment areas, CRA Banks were less likely to make a high cost loan, charged less for the high cost loans that were made, and were substantially more likely to eschew the secondary market and hold high cost and other loans in portfolio. Moreover, branch availability is a key element of CRA compliance, and foreclosure rates were lower in metropolitan areas with proportionately greater numbers of bank branches.


CRA only dealt with banks. Much of the toxic stuff was not done by banks. And, Bank of America had an ‘outstanding’ CRA rating but does not have the toxic problem of other mortgages. That is, the CRA banks were actually responsible financial institutions compared to other greedy institutions of finance.

Technorati Tags: